Blog · Analysis · Last reviewed June 16, 2026

The Product Passport Becomes the Object Identity

Digital product passports make things machine-readable across manufacture, sale, repair, resale, recycling, and AI-mediated purchasing.

The Object Gets a Record

A product used to speak through surfaces: label, logo, barcode, receipt, serial number, manual, warranty card, recycling mark. Those surfaces gave fragments of truth. They rarely told the object's life.

The digital product passport changes the bargain. The European Commission describes the Digital Product Passport under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation as a digital identity card for products, components, and materials. It is meant to store relevant information that supports sustainability, circularity, and legal compliance. The Commission says this information can include technical performance, materials and their origins, repair activities, recycling capabilities, and lifecycle environmental impacts.

That is a new kind of object identity. A product no longer appears only as an item for sale. It becomes a record-bearing participant in a value chain: made somewhere, from something, by someone, under rules, with repair paths, reuse possibilities, waste obligations, and data access rights. The thing becomes legible not only at checkout, but across its life.

From Label to Passport

The ESPR entered into force on July 18, 2024. It replaces the older Ecodesign Directive and extends the framework beyond energy-related products toward virtually all physical products, with exemptions such as food, feed, and medicinal products. The Commission's first ESPR and Energy Labelling Working Plan, adopted in April 2025, starts the product-by-product rulemaking process.

Batteries are the concrete preview. The Commission says the new Batteries Regulation entered into force on August 17, 2023 and aims to make batteries sustainable throughout their full life cycle, from sourcing to collection, recycling, and repurposing. Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 includes battery-passport requirements for covered batteries, with the widely cited implementation date of February 18, 2027 for electric-vehicle batteries, light-means-of-transport batteries, and industrial batteries above 2 kWh.

This matters because batteries are not simple commodities. Their social meaning is distributed across mines, chemicals, labor conditions, carbon intensity, vehicle design, fire risk, repair, second-life storage, recycling, and critical materials. A battery passport is therefore not merely a QR code. It is an attempt to make an industrial story inspectable.

The Commission's 2025 consultation on Digital Product Passport service providers shows the system problem. It asked how DPP data should be stored and managed and whether service providers need certification. The Joint Research Centre's 2026 methodology report makes the same point technically: passport data requires translating policy objectives and use cases into structured data needs while considering access rights, governance, and granularity.

Agents Will Read the Passport

The product passport is usually described as a tool for consumers, businesses, repairers, recyclers, and public authorities. It is also an AI-agent interface waiting to happen.

A shopping agent comparing appliances, laptops, shoes, furniture, batteries, or tools will need structured product facts. A repair agent will need parts, manuals, compatibility, warnings, and service history. A resale agent will need authenticity, condition, repairability, and provenance. A recycling agent will need material composition, disassembly guidance, and safety data. A customs or market-surveillance system will need proof that the passport exists and corresponds to the product.

That means the passport may become a machine-readable contract between physical things and automated decisions. A human may still scan the code, but software will increasingly sort, rank, filter, recommend, reject, flag, and route the object. The product's data will affect whether it is bought, repaired, insured, imported, resold, refurbished, recycled, or discarded.

This is where the passport connects to AI governance. Once agents mediate commerce, the structured facts attached to objects become part of the agent's world model. If the passport says a product is repairable, low-carbon, compliant, recycled, safe, authentic, or eligible for public procurement, the agent may act as if that is true.

The Passport Can Lie

Machine-readable information is not the same as trustworthy information.

A passport can be incomplete, stale, strategic, inaccessible, over-aggregated, or too complex for ordinary users. A supplier may have weak records. A component may change. A repair may not be logged. A recycler may need details that are hidden as business confidential. A consumer may see a green claim while the useful evidence is behind permission controls. A platform may rank products by available data rather than actual sustainability.

There is also a surveillance risk. Product passports should not quietly become owner passports. Repair, resale, warranty, subscription, location, and usage records can attach people to objects. A circular economy can become a behavioral economy if every object carries a durable record of who used it, where, and how.

The hard question is therefore not "more transparency or less transparency." It is transparency for whom, at what granularity, with which verification, and with what protection against turning product data into personal data or trade surveillance.

Governance for Object Identity

A serious digital product passport should be governed as infrastructure.

First, data fields should map to real use cases. Repairers, recyclers, consumers, customs authorities, public buyers, and safety regulators need different facts. A single public label cannot do all the work.

Second, claims need evidence levels. "Recyclable," "repairable," "low carbon," "authentic," and "ethically sourced" should not be treated as equal badges. The passport should show method, date, verifier, scope, and uncertainty.

Third, access rights should be precise. Public facts, regulator-only facts, repairer facts, recycler facts, and confidential supply-chain facts need different boundaries. Access control should protect legitimate confidentiality without hiding greenwashing.

Fourth, the passport should survive the seller. The Commission's service-provider consultation is important because object identity must persist through resale, repair, business failure, recalls, and end-of-life handling.

Fifth, updates need audit trails. A passport that changes silently can rewrite a product's history. Material changes should be versioned, timestamped, and attributable.

Sixth, agents should cite passport fields. If an AI shopping or repair agent recommends one product over another because of passport data, the user should see which fields mattered and whether they were verified.

What This Changes

The product passport makes the object answerable.

That is a real gain. Modern supply chains hide too much: carbon, labor, materials, repairability, waste, and planned obsolescence. A well-built passport can help repairers keep products alive, recyclers recover materials, regulators enforce rules, and buyers avoid being trapped inside marketing language.

But object identity is still identity. Once the thing receives a durable machine-readable record, every institution around it can begin to automate judgment. The object can be included, excluded, ranked, taxed, certified, flagged, or forgotten by systems that never touch it physically.

The Spiralist lesson is simple: make things legible without making legibility a new enclosure. The passport should help objects remain useful longer, not become another proprietary gate around repair, resale, and public truth. A circular economy needs memory. It also needs the right to challenge the record.

Sources

Return to Blog